IELTS Writing Task 2 sample essays (band 7+) with notes

A band 7+ Task 2 essay answers exactly the question asked, takes a clear position, uses four or five paragraphs with one main idea each, and supports every idea with an explanation and an example. It is around 270 to 300 words and written in 40 minutes.

Online education has grown rapidly over the past decade, and some argue that it will eventually make traditional classrooms unnecessary. While I accept that online learning will play a much larger role, I disagree that it will replace classroom teaching entirely.

There are strong reasons why online learning is expanding. It removes the cost and time of travel, allows students in small towns to learn from specialist teachers, and lets learners revise recorded lessons at their own pace. For adults who work full time, it is often the only realistic way to gain new qualifications. These advantages mean that, for many subjects, online courses are now a genuine alternative.

However, schools do far more than deliver information. Young children in particular develop social skills, discipline and confidence through daily interaction with classmates and teachers. Practical subjects such as chemistry or sport also require physical spaces and equipment that cannot be fully replicated on a screen. Moreover, not every family has a reliable internet connection or a quiet place to study, so an online-only system would widen existing inequalities.

In my view, the most likely future is a blended model, in which schools remain the centre of learning but use online tools for revision, specialist subjects and flexible scheduling.

In conclusion, although online learning offers clear benefits and will continue to grow, the social, practical and equity roles of classrooms mean that they are unlikely to disappear.

The choice of university subject is a major decision, and people disagree on whether it should be driven by personal interest or by future job prospects. This essay will examine both views before explaining why I believe interest and usefulness should be balanced.

On the one hand, there are good reasons to encourage subjects such as science and technology. Economies increasingly depend on engineers, programmers and medical professionals, and graduates in these fields usually find work more quickly. In countries where many graduates are unemployed, directing students towards high-demand fields could reduce wasted time and money.

On the other hand, students who study a subject they are passionate about tend to work harder and achieve more. A student who loves history may become an excellent teacher, researcher or journalist, roles that society also needs. Furthermore, it is difficult to predict which skills will be valuable in twenty years, and the creativity developed in arts and humanities is increasingly valued by employers.

In my opinion, students should choose subjects they are genuinely interested in, but with clear information about career outcomes. Universities and schools can support this by offering careers guidance and by allowing students to combine, for example, a humanities degree with practical digital skills.

In conclusion, while subjects linked to future demand offer security, personal interest drives motivation and achievement. The best approach is an informed choice that considers both.